#uklibchat

Instant Ideas and Collaboration

#uklibchat Summary – Digital Libraries – 6 March 2014

On 6 March 2014, we talked about digital libraries in their many forms – what exactly they are, what challenges and opportunities they offer our profession, and how library customers use them.

The full archive of tweets from this chat is available here.

Here’s a summary of the discussion:

Q1: What do you think a digital library is?

This is quite a tough question. Some thoughts were:

  • @LAICDGroup: A digital library is any library that offers access to its resources in digital form, online.
  • @archinva: a digital library is an organized collection of materials made available in digital format, I think
  • @LibrarySherpa: IMO, a contained and managed collection of resources and/or data which can only be accessed via computer or device.

@SimonXIX’s feature blog for this chat argued that Netflix and Itunes were basically digital libraries, but weren’t considered as such in LIS for cultural and legal reasons. This sparked debate about whether digital libraries by definition had to be maintained by a library organisation, and whether they had to be not for profit (at least at the point of use). Both of these criteria are problematic. Organisations like law firms and engineering companies routinely maintain digital libraries, and there are private subscription libraries like The London Library which are generally considered to be libraries.

Some contributors thought that what distinguished digital libraries from online platforms like Netflix or Youtube was that their purpose was the dissemination of knowledge, not profit. Others thought that Netflix was an example of a subscription library (like The London Library) but with poor cataloguing standards. Most people agreed that digital libraries had to be organised and curated:

  • @preater: It does imply some sort of organization / metadata / structure, as ‘online data’ != library.

Q2: What kind of digital libraries do you work with in your job?

Many participants working in higher education libraries worked with e-journal platforms, e-book repositories and databases. This is all remotely hosted digital content which library staff make accessible to local users. Examples of more local digital content in higher education were research repositories and locally digitised content.

Those working in public and school libraries worked with e-books, e-magazines, and online reference collections. @butterfly1981’s special digital library collection is made up of PDF documents useful for people working in construction – British Standards, legislation, etc. Some special libraries had more of a mix of types of content, from video and interactive e-learning modules to described and curated web content.

Participants from a variety of sectors, including academic and special libraries, are seeing a transition from print to digital collections:

  • @petewilliams68: Q2. At UEL we’re now buying e-books *instead of* print ones in many areas … we’re mainly e-journal now but becoming mainly e-book too will be a big change 

Q3: What problems do users have with digital libraries in your experience?

The most common problems cited were subscription/authentication issues, search issues, link resolvers not working properly, and technical/device compatibility problems. Digital libraries of various forms often require more search savvy and are less tolerant of errors than Google and popular websites like Youtube.

  • @archinva: my experience as user is of overwhelming websites, unattractive design and confusing organization of content
  • @SaintEvelin: Basic prob of IT skills; full-text search habits v record searching; multiple platform horror; finding the blummin’ things.
  • @jacapo47: Another infolit issue: students being told by tutors they can’t use anything from the internet so disregard e-books and e-journal

People not knowing that the digital collections exist was also still a major issue across sectors.

Some possible solutions to these common problems:

  • @chriskeene: Q3 solution: make sites more indexable/SEO friendly for google.
  • @preater: as libraries – make our own digital content much more easily findable, searchable, and indexable.
  • @SaintEvelin: the great green repository in the sky?? But diff databases do diff things. Hard to pull together in a non-lossy way
  • @jacapo47: I used old useless DVD cases to showcase e-books so each DVD case represents an e-book but is physically on the shelf…
  • @archinva: social media advertising, if not already in use, and posters inside the physical library?
  • @WillBeharrell: Probably unpopular, but RDA v. flexible in describing non-book materials in 3XX fields (which can then be displayed to users).

Q4: What similarities/differences are there between digital and non-digital libraries?

One of the main differences cited was the possibility of using digital libraries anytime, anywhere, as opposed to having to visit a physical library to access print or other physical resources. Digital libraries can be more flexible, easier to update and change. In some cases, the full text resource can act as its own catalogue record. Digital libraries also mean that librarians are less visible to users.

  • @LAICDGroup: similar remit of making information more easily available, although journal subscriptions militate against that.
  • @SaintEvelin: Publishers would love digital libraries to be same as non-digital (or even more restricted).
  • @InformationOwl: Digital libraries have potential to provide more interesting user stats. And stats are fun.

Q5: Do you think digital libraries need different cataloguing rules?

  • @chriskeene: I think we need more flexible, id based, rules for all content. print/MARC approach laughably not fit for purpose
  • @WillBeharrell: RDA already offers considerable flexibility…
  • @butterfly1981: Maybe to accommodate metadata variations as a DL can be made up of items of many formats eg images, videos, sound files
  • @SaintEvelin: So much stuff and so many new possibilities for cataloguing it. Def need for new rules, but tech moves quicker than metadata.
  • @RosieHLib: RDA is more flexible, whatever the standard we need to remember how important interoperability is in digital discovery context
  • @preater: short answer is metadata appropriate to content, and importantly sensible & easily digestible interchange formats.
  • @SaintEvelin: Full-text adds complication/liberation. Becomes its own meta-data (cf. Google). Image/sound identification processes make awe!

Q6: Is there in fact scope for librarians to ‘curate’ large born digital collections, aiding user navigation?

Participants thought there was some scope for this but were unsure. Some people had experience of ‘curating the web’ in their work – curating weblinks or Youtube videos on a particular topic and making them available to their users. This was challenging, and there were major issues with broken links and the constantly shifting nature of web content. However, on balance those who had done it thought it was worthwhile. The lack of permanence of web content wasn’t reason enough to exclude it from our collections – actually print materials can go out of date just as quickly, but we may not notice it.

  • @spoontragedy: Cataloguing/curating web based content is like cataloguing an eel, it’s slippery and sometimes it wriggles away #sillymetaphor
  • @archinva: sometimes it disappears and sometimes you find yourself with three identical eels

Q7: How do you deal with user frustration that not everything is available digitally?

Interestingly, there were many comments was more common for users to be frustrated that everything was online and they wanted it in print. These comments came from those working in public, further education and academic libraries. Certain types of book were particularly in demand in print format, like core textbooks and test preparation materials in careers libraries. Many people prefer to read large amounts of text in print format. Some also have the attitude that material in print is always more authoritative.

Ways of dealing with frustration that not everything was available electronically were to signpost users to inter library loan and other possible services – other local universities, national libraries, business libraries and more. Understanding the range of options in your area is important here.

  • @octavosaurus: It’s difficult to convey the time/cost factor in digitisation of content to users.
  • @RosieHLib: yes & generally the ‘everything online is free’ attitude without a thought about the cost of creating things online

There was a discussion about whether the attitude that ‘everything online is free’ would change over time:

  • @archinva: it’ll probably change increasingly to “you can subscribe to everything online”
  • @SaintEvelin: The old web anarchist in me hopes not. P’haps that’s the very niche public libraries can seek to fill (at a tax cost)?
  • @SaintEvelin: An idea of increasing “enclosure” of what’s been in the common for n years is a worry (even if it was all nicked!)

Q8: Would you be in favour of a national digital library? Is this feasible?

Participants thought this was an inspiring idea but challenging in terms of cost, copyright issues and coordination. Public libraries in Northern Ireland do now have a joint digital library since they have become one library authority. Maybe a national public digital library as a collaboration between UK library authorities is a possibility.

  • @chriskeene: Think national lib an interesting idea, digilib has so much infrastructure to do well that scale can really help.
  • @SaintEvelin: Today we have it. It’s Spotify. Tho it’s commercial, not state run. No appetite for state-run since ’70s…
  •  @ShirleyBurnham: Once it’s up and running, they can close all our physical libraries and tell us to get stuffed. Bright idea?
Advertisements

About spoontragedy

Former public library Children's Librarian, now working as a Careers Information Officer in a London university. Nearly finished being an #aberils student.

2 comments on “#uklibchat Summary – Digital Libraries – 6 March 2014

  1. Pingback: #uklibchat Summary – Digital Libraries – 6 March 2014 | #uklibchat - IBook Store

  2. Vanessa A.
    April 20, 2014

    Reblogged this on Librarians don't bite.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on April 17, 2014 by in Discussion Summaries and tagged , , , , , .

Categories

%d bloggers like this: